top of page
Home | Careers | About NDOT | Planning | Public Involvement | News | Documents | Contact Us
The tables on the following pages outline the improvement concepts by potential phasing, which is based on engineering complexity, project readiness, and immediacy of need. The project IDs are not meant to infer priority or phasing but to easily cross-reference projects between the recommendation maps and the following tables.
Near-term needs are typically smaller or easier to implement. They can move through design and environmental clearance quickly and likely do not require a lot of capital expense. While it is envisioned that most of these could be completed in the next five years, they must be evaluated against NDOT’s project needs across all of Nevada, meaning timing could shift based on priority.
Mid-term needs generally require additional coordination and engineering work, such as further design, right-of-way acquisition, or environmental review.
Long-term needs are not immediately warranted or have a longer planning, design, and regulatory review lead time. Long-term needs also have the potential to be combined or implemented with significant rehabilitation projects. Even though a project may be considered long-term, feasibility and other initial planning studies related to those long-term improvements should be considered as near or mid-term activities that must be done to accomplish the long-term implementation.
Phasing priorities presented in this study may fluctuate as statewide funding availability or transportation needs shift. The improvement concept recommendations made in this Corridor Plan are intended to remain the foundational vision for future development. Specific concepts, however, may change or evolve.
bottom of page